• Mr and Mrs Middle England: Worried Sick (and Not at All)

    by David Palethorpe

    Mr and Mrs Middle England are alive and well as we approach the end 2025.

    He is worried sick; she is not.

    Between them they represent two sides of the same village green: one ruled by dread, the other by perspective.

    Mr Middle England is convinced — despite all evidence — that Britain is a lawless wasteland.

    He double-bolts the doors, checks the motion sensors, and hides under his 13-TOG duvet certain that, somewhere out there, a mad axeman is sharpening his blade.

    Mrs Middle England sighs. “You’re more likely to be kept awake by indigestion than an intruder,” she reminds him, switching off the outside light he insists must blaze all night.

    If he survives the night, he spends the day peering round corners, convinced a mugger or worse still an immigrant has been following him for weeks.

    “That’s just Dave from the post office,” says Mrs Middle England.

    “He’s not stalking you — he’s late for his lunch.”

    He nods gravely at men in camo trousers and hi-viz tops shuffling past.

    “See? Urban warriors, out for trouble.”

    “More like men off to unblock a drain,” she replies.

    “If that’s camouflage, it’s working — you can barely see the fashion sense.”

    Of course, his paranoia is music to the media’s ears.

    Every hysterical headline, every “Britain is broken” editorial feeds his conviction that chaos lurks on every street corner.

    He reads the Daily Mail like a holy text.

    She skims the same stories and mutters,

    “They’d sell fewer papers if they printed the truth.”

    Because the harsh truth, which Mrs Middle England never forgets, is this:

    the violence most likely to touch a life doesn’t come from a stranger in the alleyway, but from behind closed doors.

    Domestic violence — not random muggers — is the risk too many still refuse to face.

    But paranoia is convenient.

    It keeps him frightened of shadows and strangers, rather than asking harder questions of those in power.

    It keeps him buying headlines, while she rolls her eyes and points out that the real scandal is the failure of government to protect the vulnerable.

    Take Ipplepen.

    The most notorious crime in recent years?

    The theft of a padlock from the allotment gate.

    Hardly the basis for a Netflix true-crime drama.

    But Mr Middle England still jumps at shadows.

    Mrs Middle England counters:

    “What about the neighbours who bring round soup when you’re ill?

    The kids who ride bikes safely down the street?

    The kindness we never read about?”

    And as for me, walking to the Con Club or Welly, I know which one I’d rather share a pint with.

    Mr Middle England would sip nervously, eyes darting to the door.

    Mrs Middle England would laugh, order crisps, and raise a glass to common sense.

    Because life’s too short for paranoia — and a lot better with a pint than a panic attack.

    Which brings us to their latest disagreement.

    Mr Middle England insists Britain is being “overrun by criminal gangs and immigrants.

    ” Mrs Middle England raises an eyebrow.

    “Oh don’t be silly — that’s just not true.”

    “But Nigel Farage says so,” he replies, “and even the President of the United States agrees.”

    At this, Mrs Middle England finally snaps.

    “Oh dear. If you’re going to listen to Nigel Farage and Donald Trump, then there’s no hope.

    They’re just a pair of self-serving, deranged f***wits.”

    Mr Middle England sits in stunned silence.

    Not because she’s wrong about Farage or Trump — he knows she isn’t — but because in fifty years of marriage it is the first time, he has ever heard Mrs Middle England curse.

  • Mr and Mrs Middle England in Ipplepen – Addiction

    by David Palethorpe

    There’s a couple in every village, and in Ipplepen they’re known, affectionately if not entirely sincerely, as Mr and Mrs ME.

    Not that it’s their initials — it’s just that every conversation, cause, and dietary choice eventually circles back to… well, them.

    They were vegan before it was fashionable, pescatarian when it was briefly acceptable, and are now “flexitarian,” which roughly translates to “whatever Waitrose has on offer.”

    Mr ME swears by intermittent fasting, which means skipping breakfast but making up for it with a heroic amount of artisan bread at lunch.

    (To you and me that’s bread with bits in it)

    Mrs ME, meanwhile, has declared sugar to be “toxic,” a statement usually followed by another slice of lemon drizzle “for the road.”

    They’re the kind of couple who talk about “gut health” as if it’s a religion and consider kombucha a spiritual experience.

    Their recycling bins are now colour-coded and alphabetised, and they’ve been known to glare at neighbours who dare to place the wrong sort of plastic in the blue one.

    But behind the quinoa and the self-care hashtags lies a certain restlessness.

    Mr ME recently admitted, in a moment of candour over a glass of low-sulphite Shiraz, that he rather misses bacon.

    Mrs ME, for her part, has joined a mindfulness group but can’t stop checking whether everyone else is being mindful correctly.

    They talk often about “living simply,” which is admirable, though the new garden room — complete with under-floor heating and an eco-espresso machine — somewhat complicates the message.

    They claim it’s for yoga and writing, but the neighbours have noticed it’s mostly used for watching boxed sets and ordering “sustainable” things online.

    Still, they mean well.

    And perhaps that’s what makes Mr and Mrs ME so endearing: their endless striving to be better, greener, purer — even if their carbon footprint suggests otherwise.

    In a world that’s a bit too serious, they provide the village with something far more valuable than moral instruction.

    Entertainment.

    So, if you see them out and about in Ipplepen this weekend — Mr ME in his hemp shirt, Mrs ME clutching a reusable cup the size of a small bucket — give them a smile.

    They may be insufferable, but at least they’re consistently so.

    And that, in these uncertain times, is something to celebrate.

  • It Could Happen to Anyone – But Probably Just You

    by David Palethorpe

    “It could happen to anyone…”

    We’ve all heard it — that tired old phrase people trot out when someone has been caught red-handed or is about to be publicly embarrassed.

    It’s usually followed by an awkward laugh, a pat on the shoulder, and a half-hearted attempt to downplay what everyone knows was avoidable in the first place.

    Well, I have news for you: it couldn’t happen to anyone. Because if it could, surely it would happen to everyone.

    Where it might happen to anyone, however, is on that great leveller of human behaviour — the internet.

    Or as they say up North, “tinternet.”

    I suspect the number of times people used the phrase “it could happen to anyone” increased dramatically during COVID-19.

    After all, lockdown created the perfect conditions for human error: too much time, too little company, and far too easy access to the online world.

    As people sat at home, idly scrolling through endless feeds and chat rooms, I wonder how many suddenly made “new friends” on social media.

    You know the type — people who claim to share your interests, your humour, your dreams.

    Before long, the friendly chats turn personal.

    The personal chats turn intimate.

    And the next thing you know, emails are being exchanged containing sentiments that are… shall we say, of dubious content.

    After months of isolation, the heart can override the head — and sometimes the keyboard.

    Until one day you discover that your new online love — the 22-year-old redhead from Dumbarton who “works in marketing and loves dogs” — is actually a 72-year-old retired bus driver from Evesham who only loves Spam sandwiches and crosswords.

    It’s at that point that people reach for that old line of defence:

    “Well, it could happen to anyone!”

    No, it couldn’t.

    It happened to you.

    That’s the problem with the virtual world — you can expose yourself in all your naked glory while sitting in the safety of your own living room.

    One simple tap of the ‘Enter’ key and your deepest, most personal thoughts are launched into cyberspace, where they will circulate forever.

    Normal rules of conduct, restraint, good manners, and decorum don’t seem to apply online.

    People who would never dream of shouting at someone in the street will happily type abuse in block capitals to complete strangers.

    And let’s not forget the unthinking “Like” or “Share” of a post that turns out to be racist, sexist, misogynistic, or otherwise offensive.

    Those moments have a nasty habit of resurfacing years later — especially if you ever fancy a career in politics.

    Screenshots, after all, are forever.

    It’s easy to wander into trouble online.

    You may inadvertently stumble across a website you didn’t mean to open — but keeping it open is a choice.

    Take, for example, the simple task of searching for the lyrics to Everlasting Love by the group Love Affair.

    Type in “lyrics to the song Everlasting Love by Love Affair” and you’ll find exactly what you wanted.

    Type in just “Everlasting Love” and you may find yourself staring at something altogether more… revealing.

    Let’s just say that in some corners of the internet, “Everlasting Love” takes on an entirely different meaning — one that’s both anatomical and alarmingly enthusiastic. (Or so I’ve been told)

    The extra time people spent online during lockdown and since has also shone a light on the curious ecosystem of conspiracy theorists who inhabit cyberspace.

    They range from harmless eccentrics to full-blown, tinfoil-hat-wearing nut jobs.

    And then, of course, there was the former and now once again President of the United States and here in England Nigel Farage — proof, if ever it were needed, that access to Wi-Fi should sometimes come with an intelligence test.

    Who knows — perhaps there’s even a secret corner of the web dedicated to modern-day Luddites, a forum for people proudly opposed to technology but somehow still using it to tell everyone about it.

    The internet is a two-dimensional world that tempts us away from the three-dimensional reality we actually live in.

    It’s filled with wonders — the largest library ever created the ability to translate every language, to explore every idea.

    But it also hides more questionable corners: the places where “flexibility” means something quite different from what your physiotherapist had in mind.

    Stray into the wrong site and you could find yourself knee-, waist-, or even nipple-deep in a digital swamp of pornography, conspiracy, and chaos — all without leaving your armchair.

    Science and technology have given us incredible tools.

    The vaccines that helped save millions of lives from COVID-19 were designed and developed by scientists and technologists sharing information across the world through technology.

    Without them, we’d still be clapping on doorsteps and disinfecting our shopping deliveries.

    But with the same brilliance that can decode DNA and build Mars rovers, we’ve also managed to create cat memes, deepfakes, and dating apps that pair humans with bots.

    The microchip has made geniuses of some, addicts of others, and fools of many.

    Which is why, perhaps, those who’ve resisted embracing the digital revolution might be onto something.

    The so-called technophobes who still write cheques and read paperbacks can sit back smugly and say:

    “It could happen to someone.”

    “It could happen to anyone.”

    “But it couldn’t happen to me.”

    Because they’re not out there clicking, swiping, and posting their way into trouble.

    They’re living in the real world — a world where embarrassment fades with time rather than being stored permanently on a server in California.

    So, the next time you hear someone sigh and mutter the excuse, “It could happen to anyone,” remember and perhaps point out to them,

    “It probably couldn’t”.

    “It just happened to you.

  • Why Make the Effort – “Not My Cup of Tea”

    I was sat in a Costa the other day where, in spite of the name, I ordered a cup of tea.

    Not for me one of the multitudes of Earl Greys or flavoured blends, but a simple mug of builders’ tea.

    Even that, however, has now been branded as “English Breakfast.”

    Which begs the question: what happens if you want it for lunch?

    My immediate reaction was — Error, error! 

    For one very simple reason: tea is supposed to be made with boiling water, water that has reached at least 100 degrees centigrade.

    The one I received was, at best, lukewarm.

    A warning to all you young people:

    As you get older, you find you become dismayed at most things, most of the time.

    Now, I understand why the tea was only warm.

    Coffee, and for that matter hot chocolate, as produced by the fancy machines in such establishments, is made with water or milk — or both — at a temperature some way short of boiling point.

    That’s how the best coffee is brewed.

    As a digression, I once bought a cup at the Costa in Dubai Airport made with boiling water.

    It was undrinkable, not just because of the temperature but because it was bitter.

    Anyway, back to Costa in Newton Abbot.

     Coffee, I decided, was going to be the answer.

    The tea was, to put it mildly, “not my cup of tea.”

    Which is a strange thing to say.

    Since I’d paid for it, it was obviously my cup of tea — except in the colloquial sense that, because of its temperature, it wasn’t.

    That incident set me thinking about other things that aren’t “my cup of tea.”

    Premiership football (soccer, to our American cousins), the UK Government, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage, Benjamin Netanyahu and South West Water being amongst many.

    Closer to home: bad drivers who cut you up or fail to acknowledge when you let them in, bad roads, and of course certain people I’ve met — some of whom for a reason only known to themselves continue to refer to me as a colleague when they have made it clear I am definitely not “their cup of tea”.

    In their case, I simply avoid or ignore them whenever possible.

    It’s strange.

    When you’re young — and I mean very young — you want and expect everyone to be your friend.

    But at what point do we realise that isn’t possible?

    When do we understand that some people simply aren’t “our cup of tea” — and that we aren’t theirs?

    At what point do we decide that we’re not impressed by certain people, or that we’re not going to waste any effort trying to deal them?

    Of course, and quite naturally, we must also remember that some people think exactly the same about us.

    Think of those we meet on holiday — people we’ll never see again — and ask yourself: why do we even try to impress them?

    Worse still is when, just like my lukewarm tea, we continue to spend time on people who don’t really matter to us.

    That isn’t to say that people don’t matter.

    Everyone matters — but not necessarily to us as individuals.

    Not everyone you meet will like you, and sometimes there’s no obvious reason why.

    Likewise, you won’t like everyone you meet — and you couldn’t explain why if asked.

    So why make the effort?

    Wouldn’t we be better off concentrating on those we love, and who love us?

    As it happens, I like both coffee and tea.

    So whether someone is “not my cup of tea” or even “my cup of coffee,” the result will be the same: I’ll be polite when in their company, but I won’t seek their company out.

    Life is simply far too short.

  • Fat Orange Man

    by David Palethorpe

    A big fat ugly orange man today

    Appeared on my TV.

    He was so obviously mad,

    It was fascinating to see.

    I listened to the orange man —

    What did he have to say?

    It was a speech with lots of words

    He could not pronounce.

    He spoke with great conviction,

    I didn’t believe a word,

    Not a single ounce —

    Except that he’d convinced himself,

    As all mad men always do.

    The only problem was,

    None of it was true.

    For all he did was lie and lie.

    He claimed everybody else

    Was wrong — and then he simply lied

    That they were guilty of fake news.

    He included everyone

    Who doesn’t share his views.

    But guilty, guilty, guilty —

    Of that there is no doubt.

    The orange man will one day-

    face trial-

    He’s finally been found out.

  • COMMON SENSE WHAT HAPPENED?

    Back in 1776, Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense.

    I’ve just re-read it — the last time was in the early 1960s, when my history teacher (a republican, anti-monarchist socialist, and war veteran) insisted Paine was one of the greatest people who ever lived.

    For us, raised on pink-splashed maps of empire, hymn sheets of “God on England’s side,” and school drills to make us fit enough for the next war, that was radical stuff.

    But Paine — a corset maker from Norfolk — helped fuel the propaganda that carried the American Revolution to success.

    He believed in reason, free thought, and the right of people to overthrow their government.

    He rejected institutional religion.

    He was no saint, but his words mattered.

    John Adams himself admitted: 

    “Without the pen of the author of Common Sense, the sword of Washington would have been raised in vain.”

    And yet Paine died ostracised.

    Only six people attended his funeral.

    A life of radical clarity, dismissed by the country he helped found.

    I wonder how his views would fare in today’s America.

    His deism alone would send evangelical leaders into fits of righteous fury.

    His insistence that people can and should depose failing governments?

    You can imagine the headlines on Fox or GB News.

    The irony is clear: 

    Common Sense in its broadest sense was never more necessary — and never scarcer.

  • In My Day Building on the Past to Shape the Future

    It’s become something of a national pastime to start a sentence with, “Well, in my day…” — usually followed by a story that sounds like a cross between a Monty Python sketch and a survival manual.

    I hear it all the time, and I’ll admit, I’ve said it myself once or twice. (Alright, maybe more than twice.)

    I grew up in a house where ice formed on the inside of the windows.

    Not the trendy Scandinavian kind, either — I mean actual, crunchable frost.

    We’d wake up in the morning, see our breath in the bedroom, and think it was perfectly normal.

    If you were lucky, you got to scrape your initials into the ice before sprinting downstairs to the coal fire that only heated one room — and only if you’d managed to coax it to life with half a newspaper and a lot of prayer.

    Bath night was Sunday.

    Not “bath nights” plural. One.

    Shared, if you were unlucky, with your siblings.

    If you were last in the queue, you didn’t so much bathe as just rearrange the dirt.

    And of course, there was always that claim that we walked 20 miles through the snow to school, uphill both ways.

    It’s funny now, but that image — immortalised by the Monty Python “Four Yorkshiremen” sketch — perfectly captures how we exaggerate the hardships of our youth and turn them into moral lessons for today’s children.

    (“You had an iPad? Luxury! We were lucky to have a pencil!”)

    But here’s the truth: it wasn’t idyllic.

    It was cold.

    It was tough.

    It was, and quite frankly, a bit grim.

    And yet, through the fog of memory, it’s easy to forget that and convince ourselves that life was somehow better back then.

    The Nostalgia Trap: We all have those moments when we think,

    “Everything’s gone downhill since…” — fill in your own year of choice.

    For me, it’s usually somewhere between the end of proper buses and the rise of reality television.

    And yet, there are parts of the past worth missing.

    Back then, public transport worked because it had to.

    Few people owned cars, so buses were frequent, punctual, and went where people actually lived.

    Today, we have more cars than people, yet somehow, fewer ways to get around without one.

    And then there’s the mythical “bobby on the bike.”

    You know the one — the kindly policeman who kept the peace with a stern look and a gentle clip round the ear.

    He’s as much a part of our collective imagination as unicorns and affordable housing.

    Truth be told, most of us never met him.

    He probably existed only on black-and-white television, where everyone wore a hat and nobody swore.

    The Truth About “The Good Old Days”: When people sigh about “kids today,” I sometimes wonder what we expect them to do differently.

    The world we see now is the one we built.

    The parents and grandparents of today’s teenagers grew up in the 60s, 70s, and 80s — the era of social change, fast food, cheap flights, and instant gratification.

    It’s a bit rich to complain that today’s youth are glued to their phones when we were the ones who invented the technology and marketed it to them.

    We’ve shaped this world, so we can’t scold the next generation for trying to survive in it.

    The real challenge is to make sure we hand over something better than we received — not just warmer houses, but warmer communities.

    Sixty-Two People and a Cup of Perspective: Here’s a thought that stops me in my tracks: it took 62 people — 31 men and 31 women — across five generations to make you possible.

    Think about that.

    Sixty-two lives, each with their own struggles, triumphs, and probably at least one dodgy haircut, all leading up to this moment.

    That’s an unbroken chain stretching back through history — and we’re now one of the links.

    It’s humbling, really.

    We don’t owe those ancestors anything, but we do owe something to the generations who’ll come after us.

    They’ll inherit the world we build — our towns, our climate, our choices.

    One day, they’ll look back at photographs of us and say, “They didn’t have flying cars, but they did alright.”

    Building the Future Without Breaking the Past:

    That’s where nostalgia can be both a comfort and a trap.

    In local government, I see it all the time.

    Every town has its version of “Why can’t it stay the way it was?” — but if we’d always listened to that, we’d still be lighting coal fires and sharing Sunday baths.

    When we regenerate places like Queen Street, Market Hall or Bradley Lane, it’s not about erasing the past.

    It’s about honouring it by building on it.

    Every new brick, every redesigned space, is a continuation of a story — one written by those who came before, for those yet to come.

    I like to think our job isn’t to preserve nostalgia, but to preserve purpose.

    To make sure the future still feels like home, even as it changes.

    So yes, I’ll still tell stories that begin with “In my day…” because they make me smile — and occasionally make others laugh.

    But I’ll also finish the sentence with a reminder:

    “In my day, we made do. But in their day, let’s make better.”

    Because the past was never perfect. It was just ours. And now, it’s our turn to build a future worth someone else’s nostalgia.

    Author’s Note

    David Palethorpe is the Deputy Leader of Teignbridge District Council and Executive Member for Economic Development, Assets, and Communications. He writes about community, regeneration, and public purpose — often with a dash of humour. This reflection was inspired by the conversations surrounding local renewal projects in Newton Abbot, Devon such as Queen Street, Market Hall and Bradley Lane, and by the belief that progress isn’t about losing what we love, but passing on something better.

  • Donald Trump – Is Not Even Second

    by David Palethorpe

    What? I’m not the first? But I am, I am! (stamps foot, throws tantrum)

    What do you get when you have a man whose personality demonstrates, on every occasion, an excess of arrogance and ignorance that is almost unimaginable?

    What happens when that man believes he can do what he likes, when he likes, to whomever he likes, without fear of consequence?

    Well, history has shown us.

    We saw it in the early 20th century, and the consequences scarred the whole world.

    In the 21st century, we appear to have been landed with a self-absorbed, megalomaniac, racist, fascist, and sexual predator as President of the United States.

    But here’s the point: Donald Trump isn’t unique.

    He isn’t the first.

    In fact, he’s far from it.

    History is littered with men who strutted onto the stage convinced of their own genius, dismissive of facts, contemptuous of opposition, and determined to bend the world to their will.

    Mussolini boasted of making trains run on time.

    Hitler claimed to be Germany’s saviour.

    Franco, Stalin, and countless others insisted only they could fix their nation’s “problems.”

    Each wrapped themselves in nationalism.

    Each sneered at democratic norms.

    Each demanded loyalty while showing none to their people.

    Even outside Europe, the pattern repeats.

    In Latin America, the strongman dictator became a cliché.

    In Africa and Asia, leaders from Idi Amin to Mao ruled through bluster, fear, and a cult of personality.

    The names differ, the accents change, but the characteristics are depressingly familiar: arrogance, ignorance, and the conviction of their own greatness.

    Donald Trump is merely the latest in a long, dismal line.

    His rhetoric is not new.

    His tantrums are not unique.

    His contempt for truth and decency is not original.

    So, if Trump insists on being “first” at something, history has bad news for him.

    The only thing he has achieved is to prove that the world remains vulnerable to the oldest trick in the book: a man shouting loudly, promising everything, and delivering division.

    How galling it must be for him to discover that, in the grand scheme of human folly, he is not the first at all — not even the second, he is only the most recent.

  • Value Life

    We wait with patience,
    From the moment of birth,
    Unknowing the hour
    We’ll depart from this earth.

    In the meantime, a lifetime—
    Of laughter and mirth;
    So go out and live it,
    And cherish its worth.

  • Wonderful
    By David Palethorpe

    Today is a wonderful day,
    Tomorrow will be wonderful too.
    Today is the day we dreamed of yesterday,
    A promise we once looked forward to.

    When we think of the past,
    Is it what we expected?
    Or something we’d rather forget—
    Did it bring the dreams we imagined,
    Of living a wonderful life?

    Every day holds something wonderful.
    How many such days
    Does life keep in store for you?
    Wonderful days make a wonderful life.

    And today is the beginning—
    What a wonderful day.

Reflections of a Boomer

Reflections on life of an insignificant atom in the universe

Skip to content ↓